ENG 333 Communication for Science and Research |
||||
|
ExamplesExamples
|
Jamie Larsen, InstructorActivity - E-mail
It is easy to fall into the pit of exaggerating when you are trying to convince someone of your recommendation. You want your Abstract (Executive Summary) to be believable, so you need to address inherent limitations and assumptions. You do not want your readers identifying these on their own. If they do, then they will go one step further and ask themselves why you did not see these delimiters to your proposal. This will ultimately hurt your credibility, and argument. Limitations Limitations can make your recommendations less valid, or valid only under certain conditions. Usually these arise because of time or money constraints. For example, in the following excerpt, time is obviously the limitation: A campus store wants to know what kinds of clothing will appeal to college students. This proposal's current recommendations will last only as long as the style and fashion of the day are popular. Once you identify a limitation, you can then state how you plan to handle the condition. In the above example, you could say something like, "Therefore, in my plan I provide for a periodic customer survey of students' clothing tastes in order to quickly adapt to changing styles." Assumptions Assumptions are statements whose truth you assume, and which you use to prove your final point. If they are wrong, then your conclusion will be wrong too. Almost all proposals require assumptions. You need to spell them out clearly for decision makers, or they will conclude that you are hiding them, or worse, unaware of them. The following is a clear statement of inherent assumptions that will affect a proposal: To plan cars that will be built five years from now, a car maker will need to make certain assumptions about gas prices and the economy to determine what people will want, and be able to buy.
|
|||