Statement of the Mathematical Exploration
Through investigating the following pattern of tiles, we can explore
the pattern in graphical form using a graphing calculator, and develop
several algebraic rules to describe the pattern. Each of these algebraic
rules can be shown to be equivalent expressions and related to the geometric
arrangement in the pattern.

My Mathematical Exploration
Looking at these tiles above, I was able to continue the pattern for
the next three terms. I created a table of values that showed the term
verses the number of tiles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then I inserted this data into my STAT lists on my graphing calculator (TI-83) and created a scatter plot.

From the data and the graph, I can tell that the pattern is not growing
linearly. I hypothesized that the equation would be a quadratic and then
analyzed the pattern and table to see if I could develop an algebraic rule.
I generated two algebraic rules that would determine the number of tiles
needed for the nth term. The two rules I used for the number needed in
the nth term were
and
.
I graphed these equations with my Y= tool. I could see then that my rules
corresponded with the data.


The nth term is represented by the variable X. I came up with the first
equation by looking at the pattern. I noticed the area of the rectangle
formed by the center tiles is equivalent to one less than the term multiplied
by one more than the term (length times width). Then, there are two outside
blocks, so I added two. The first set of tiles had no center tiles; therefore,
the number of tiles is two:
.
This equation corresponds well with the geometric arrangement of the tiles.
We take the area of the center rectangle and add two. From the tile arrangement,
it is very easy to see how I put together my equation.
I formulated the second equation from the chart I made (term vs. # of tiles). I observed for each term that the number of tiles are equal to the term squared plus one. The second equation does not correspond well with the geometric arrangement as it is presented. However, if we were to rearrange the tiles so that the top row of tiles were turned and placed on the side of the center tiles, we could see a perfect square with side equal to the term number plus one extra tile. Below, I have shown that the two equations are equivalent.
![]()
Reflection on How the Technology Tool Helped My Conceptual Understanding
I had never looked at functions from a patterning perspective before
this exploration. The visual pattern of the tiles makes the relationships
between the terms of the function, along with their powers or coefficients,
seem less abstract than just looking at a function by itself outside of
any context. It may be easier for some students to develop function
rules from the tiles, than from the table of numbers. For me, the
tiles helped the table of numbers make sense. Generated two different
algebraic rules to describe the pattern challenged me to look at the problem
in more than way. As I explained above, I was able to generate one rule
based on the rectangular array in the pattern. This connection to my understanding
of area was helpful. Looking for a rule based on the table made me think
about the numerical pattern. From studying the list, I recognized that
every number in the "number of tiles" list was one more than a perfect
square number. This was a different type of pattern recognition than I
did with studying the geometrical tile pattern. I feel like this exploration
helped me see how patterns can be used to develop algebraic thinking in
students and help them develop an understanding of a function. The ability
to see patterns is not only useful in solving mathematics-based problems,
but also other types of problems as well.
An Outline of a Four-Point Lesson Plan for Investigating Patterns With a Graphing Calculator
Objective: 8th grade students will analyze a given geometric pattern, generate a table of values and graph of their data, create at least two algebraic rules to describe the pattern, and justify why their rules are equivalent and are connected to the geometric pattern.
Phase 1: Problem Posing
I will displays several geometric patterns on the
board or overhead. I will challenge students to continue the pattern for
the next several terms and discuss how the pattern is growing. They are
to determine how many objects would be needed for the 100th term in each
of the patterns and to eventually describe a rule for finding the number
of objects needed at any term (n) in the pattern. Some sample patterns
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Phase 2: Small-Group Investigation
The students will work in small groups of 3-4 to investigate a pattern.
Students will have tiles, paper and pencil, and their graphing calculators.
Each group will work on a pattern, with only two groups working on the
same pattern. I will circulate and ask the students guiding questions concerning
how they are modelling the pattern. During the group work, I will ask guiding
questions that encourage the students to use the table of numbers, the
geometric pattern and a graph of their data to help them describe how the
pattern is growing. If the students are having difficulty writing a general
rule given the nth term, I will focus them on the geometric pattern and
ask them to describe the dimensions of the figures in terms of n. I will
certainly encourage students to come up with different ways of describing
their pattern and to make connections between the symbolic, geometric,
and numerical representations.
Phase 3: Whole-Class Discussion of Investigation
For each pattern explored, I will draw a group's name at random and
ask that group to present their exploration to the whole class. The other
group that explored that same pattern will have the opportunity to compare
and contrast their thinking with the first group's process. All equivalent
expressions for a pattern's rule will be written on the board to be explored
at the end of the period.
Each pattern will be explored and discussed and I will guide the class
in encouraging them to make the connections betwen the geometric, numerical,
and symbolic representations. Each pattern will be graphed using the Stats
Plot feature on the GC and the class will compare and contrast how each
of the patterns are growing (1 & 2 are linear, 3 & 4 are quadratic).
Phase 4: Summarizing and Extending
After each group has presented their findings and justified their reasoning,
I will summarize the findings for each pattern, especially the various
symbolic rules. Students will record this information on a worksheet containing
each of the four patterns. For homework, the students are to further
analyze each of the patterns and describe the similarities between 1 and
2, and then between 3 and 4. Students will then describe the differences
between the pair of 1 & 2 and the pair 3 & 4. The students are
also challenged to explain why the different symbolic expressions are equivalent.
Although we have not done any formal simplification of algebraic expressions,
I am hoping this task will lead us into this discussion tomorrow.