EMS 480
Individual Course Project
The purpose of the course project is to synthesize what you have learned
about teaching and learning mathematics, and the appropriate use of technology
to enhance these processes. The project and presentation are worth 30 % of your final grade.
An overview of the different parts of the project:
(given percents are percent of FINAL COURSE GRADE)
Part 1: Pre-Analysis (5%)
- Each student will choose a particular mathematics topic focus
early in the semester. The first phase in planning to teach a topic is
having a deep understanding of the topic itself as well as how students learn
this topic, including common misconceptions and suggested "best practices"
from experienced researchers and teachers. To begin your project, you
need to develop an informed opinion about the learning and teaching of
a particular mathematics topic.Write a paper that includes: 1) how students
learn a particular mathematics concept, 2) implications for how that concept
should be taught, and 3) how you think a technology tool may be able to
help students learn this concept.
- PBS & UNDERGRADUATE: Provide a 3-page
paper with references to PSSM Standards and 3 journal articles required using APA reference style!
- GRADUATE: Provide a 4-5 page paper with
references to PSSM Standards and 5 research journal literature required using APA reference style!
See Grading Rubric Below!!
Part 2: Lesson Design (10%)
- Create a 2-day investigation of a mathematics
topic that utilizes at least one technology tool explored in this course.
Must provide a clearly written description, lesson plan ,and student
worksheets, if needed. Lesson plan must clearly identify the NCTM Principles
and Standards adressed in the investigation and the specific NCSCOS objectives.
Use the FourPhase lesson format as a guide.
See Grading Rubric Below (revised 10/25/04)
Part 3: Teaching
- Each student will locate a student (preferably someone who
is familiar with the technology your lesson uses) and engage this student
in one of the two days you planned for your investigation. This
teaching session should be audio and/or video taped.
Part 4: Analysis of Student's Work
(10%)
- After teaching the lesson, you will analyze the video and/or
audio tape and prepare a written description of: 1) what you did during
the teaching session, 2) an analysis of the student's mathematical understadings
of the concept that you taught, and 3) a detailed account of the student's
use of technology and its relationship to the learning of the mathematical
concept addressed in your investigation.
- PBS and UNDERGRADS should write a 3-4 page paper
- GRADUATES should write a 5-6 page paper that includes a synthesis
of what you observed in the analysis of students' work with the research
literature (minimum 5 references) on students' learning of the mathematics
topic or with the technology tool used.
Part 5: Reflection (2%)
- Write a 2-page reflection on the entire cycle process. What
did you learn about the mathematics topic? What did you learn about
teaching this topic and about students' understandings of this topic? Is
there anything that you would do differently if you were to use this investigation
again? What did you learn about the use of technology for this topic?
Final Product and Showcase (3%)
- At the end of the semester, you should
compile your complete project into one comprehensive professional
document that will be shared with class members electronically.
- You will also do a 20-minute oral presentation
of the entire project during a project showcase. At least 10 minutes
of that presentation should engage other students in a "glimpse" of
the investigation you have planned. The remaining time should
be used to discuss your rationale for the methods and technology used,
the analysis of students' work, personal reflections, and questions/comments
from the group.
Suggestions for getting started:
- Choose a "big idea" in mathematics that interests you (e.g.,
functions, similarity, rate of change). Make a list of some of
the major concepts and skills within that "big idea". As you review the
sources listed below, you should further refine and focus your "big idea"
into a topic for a solid 2-day investigation at the grade level of your
choice.
- Look through the website supporting the NCTM Principles and Standards for
suggestions related to your topic of study, including the Illuminations site and the Electronic
Examples . You will need to cite which of the 6 Principles and 10 Standards
you address in your investigation.
- Review the North Carolina
State Department of Public Instruction - Mathematics Curriculum to
identify the objectives related to your topic. You will need to cite these
objectives in your lesson plan.
- Preservice/lateral entry teachers: Do a search on your
topic both on the internet AND in print journals such as Mathematics Teacher , Mathematics Teaching in the Middle
School , School Science
and Mathematics and Learning
and Leading with Technology . Look for suggested ways to teach
your topic. You are required to reference at least 3 journal literature
sources.
- Graduate level teachers: Do a search on your topic
both on the internet AND in books or print journals such as Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
, School Science and
Mathematics , Journal of Computers
in Mathematics and Science Teaching ,
International Journal of Computers in Mathematics Learning . These
are only suggested resources. I suggest you do a comprehensive library
search. You are required to reference at least 5 research-based articles.
- Arrange one or two sessions with a student during which time
you will enage him or her in one of the two days you planned for your mathematical
investigation. Collect data during the teaching session. This
should include a video and/or audio tape, notes you recorded during the
session, and the student's written and/or electronic work. Analyze
the data. Your analysis should include a characterization about
how the student was thinking about the mathematical concept, a description
of the ways in which he or she used the technology, and an analysis of
the interactions between the student's mathematical understandings and his
or her use of technology. Reflect on your teaching session and record
what you think went well and what you might change if you were to use the
investigation again.
- And, most importantly, keep asking yourself critical questions
about HOW and WHY technology enhances or extends the teaching and learning
of your topic. You need to formulate a solid rationale in support
of the teaching methods and technology you will use in your 2-day investigation
of this mathematics topic.
Guide and Rubric for Grading Project Product
RUBRIC
FOR PART 1: PRE-ANALYSIS PAPER
| SECTION |
POINTS POSSIBLE |
| I. Description of your "big idea", the important concepts
and skills related to that big idea, and the focused topic for your investigation. |
3 |
| II. Description of how students learn the particular
mathematics concept identified in part I. This should include references
to NCTM's Principles and Standards for School Mathematics and journal
articles. |
5 |
| III. Discussion of the implications part II has on the
methods that you will use in the teaching of your topic. This should
include references to NCTM's Principles and Standards for School Mathematics
and journal articles. |
5 |
| IV. A description about how a technology tool may be able
to help students learn this concept. This should include references to
NCTM's Principles and Standards for School Mathematics and journal articles. |
5 |
| V. Overall presentation (proper citations, complete
reference list, well organized, correct spelling, proper grammar
used, etc) ** Need at least 3 journal references as well as NCTM
PSSM. (grad students need 5 journal article references) |
2 |
RUBRIC FOR PART 2:
LESSON DESIGN
| SECTION |
POINTS POSSIBLE |
| I. Provide a 1-2 paragraph description of the context
of your lesson (grade level, course, students) and what students would have
experienced about your topic beofre this lesson. |
2 |
| II. The two-day lesson plan includes a detailed outline
of what the teacher and students will be doing throughout the
investigation on each day. It includes guiding questions
that will be posed to students by the teacher. Worksheets/Handouts
that will be used by students are included. Proper citations are
used. |
22
(11 points for each day)
|
III. Connections to NCTM's 2000 Principles and Standards and
NCSCOS are clearly indicated. |
4 |
| IV. Overall presentation, references, and grammar |
2 |
RUBRIC FOR PART 4: ANALYSIS
| SECTION |
POINTS POSSIBLE |
| I. General description of the student (age, mathematics
background, technology experience) and a detailed account of what happened
during the teaching session. |
3 |
| II. A detailed analysis of the student's mathematical
understandings of the concept and what mathematics the student learned
during the session. Specific examples are provided that include the student's
exact words to support for claims about your analysis of the student's understanding
of mathematics. |
10 |
| III. A discussion about the relationship between the student's
use of technology to their learning of the mathematical concept. Specific
examples are provided that include screen shots as needed. |
10 |
| IV. Overall presentation and grammar |
2 |
V. Reflection is clearly written and addresses
all the requested components (what you learned about mathematics, student
learning, teaching, technology, and a description of what you would change).
There is evidence of thoughtful reflection that goes beyond just summarizing
a reading or stating unlinked thoughts.
|
8
|
VI.Overall presentation and grammar
|
2
|
RUBRIC FOR 20 MINUTE SHOWCASE PRESENTATION AND FINAL PRODUCT
|
Part of Presentation
|
Possible Points |
| Provide a clear "glimpse" at the investigation that actively
engagesthe class in using technology. (5-6 minutes) |
10
|
| Provide a clear concise summary of your rationale for the
methods and technology used. (1-2 minutes) |
5
|
| Provide a glimpse of the analysis you did of students'
work with your investigation (1-2 minutes) |
5
|
| Provide a brief "glimpse" at your personal reflections
on developing and teaching this investigation and answer any questions
from peers. (1-2 minutes) |
5
|
Make available a copy of your full final project
(all parts), including any technology files that were used. Everyone's final
projects will be included on the final course CD
|
2
|