ENG/FL 222, sec. 003, Spring 2004
TH 9:50 – 11:20, Harrelson 233
Dr. Helga G. Braunbeck
Room 224, 1911 Building, 515-9320
Helga_Braunbeck@ncsu.edu
http://www4.ncsu.edu/~hgb/
Office hours: Tue 1 - 1:45 p.m., Wed. 11 - 11:45
a.m., and by appointment,
feel free to contact me, email is best
Course web site for enrolled students: http://webct.ncsu.edu
Required Texts
The Norton Anthology of World Masterpieces, 7th edition, Volume II,
Sarah Lawall and Maynard Mack, eds. (New York, London: W. W. Norton, 1999).
Shannon, Edward A., The Prentice Hall Guide to Writing about Literature
(Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2002).
Course Description
In this course we will explore the Western literary tradition through reading,
discussing, and writing about some of the major works of European literature
from the eighteenth through twentieth centuries. We will also pay attention
to the political and cultural contexts of these works.
Learning Goals
By the end of the course you should be able to:
• explain the characteristics of the major literary periods of Western
Culture from the Enlightenment to Modernism
• describe how a literary text reflects its historical context
• identify the literary and rhetorical devices employed in a text, such
as genre, point of view, irony, satire, imagery, etc., and relate them to the
content of the text
• discuss, orally and in writing, selected literary texts of Western Culture
from the 18th century to the first half of the 20th century and their continuing
aesthetic validity or challenge
• write a coherent essay on given topics about these texts and their contexts,
supporting arguments with evidence (quotes) from the literary texts.
Course Requirements and Evaluation
| Attendance | Impact on grade is defined below in “Class Attendance Policy” |
| Class Work | 10% Whole class and group discussion, see below for details |
| WebCT Discussions | 10%, (7 + 3%) see below for details |
| 6 Writing Assignments | 15% (6 x 2.5%) see below for details |
| Paper 1 | 10%, see below for details |
| Paper 2 | 15%, see below for details |
| Midterm Exam | 20% Exam on material from first half of semester |
| Final Exam | 20% Exam on material from second half of semester |
Evaluation of Class Work
For your participation in class, your grade will be determined using the following
criteria:
A = you are well prepared and participate actively; you are attentive, respond
when called upon and volunteer often with pertinent questions and comments.
B = you are usually prepared and always respond when called on; you volunteer
on occasion.
C= you show evidence of being unprepared; you have some trouble when called
on and do not volunteer often.
D = you are unprepared and/or inattentive; you never volunteer; you come to
class late and/or leave early.
F= you exhibit a lack of concern for the class; you sleep in class; your behaviour
may have a negative effect on the class.
Group Work
There will be a lot of group activities. The above evaluation criteria also
apply to group work. Be a good team member in partner work or small group activities.
Turn your chair to create an easy setting for interaction with your partner(s).
Volunteer information, keep the work moving along, but don’t dominate.
Help your partners, if they are having a more difficult time (helping others
is an excellent way to learn for yourself!). In order to be a good team player
you need to be well prepared for class. Each member of a group should take notes
about the ideas generated in the group and be prepared to give a report to the
class.
WebCT Discussions
Post 7 original contributions on 7 different authors, each one at least 7 lines
long; each of these is worth 1% for a total of 7%. You should make one good
point and also back it up a bit, i.e. explain why, or support it with a quote
from the text or a reference to the text. In addition, post 6 responses to contributions
by others, again on 6 different authors, each one at least 5 lines long; each
of these is worth 1/2% for a total of 3%. Again back it up by explaining why,
or by using a quote or referring to the text. For the contributions: copying
or even slightly varying postings by your fellow students is not acceptable;
before you post, please read what is there already in order to avoid duplication
(or else it could lead to a failing grade for your posting). For the responses
you obviously comment on what has been stated. Be sure to place your response
with the comment to which it responds.
On these postings you will simply be evaluated pass/fail. If you pass, you’ll
get full credit. If your first attempt at a contribution or response is a fail,
we will discuss it in office hour and you’ll get another chance for that
first attempt. Since there are more opportunities for postings than the required
number, late postings will not carry credit. However, you may post as much as
you like for the sake of the discussion, as long as you keep it focused on discussing
the literature. Please keep purely personal issues out of these postings.
WebCT Postings Topics and Calendar
The topics and questions in the “Speaking Assignments” (see WebCT)
will be issues you should address. You can pick one issue to which you respond
or even part of an issue; please preface your contribution with the issue on
which you are commenting, maybe in the form of a short heading. For the texts
for which there are no speaking assignments, you can address how the text represents
a certain issue or how the author has constructed the text.
Dates by which your 7 original contributions and 6 responses should be posted are noted on the schedule. Since there are 12 authors you have some flexibility; however, late postings will NOT count. Cutoff time is midnight, when the date changes. In order not to get behind with these postings, I recommend you make at least 4 contribution and 3 response postings by Thursday, February 19; then make the remaining postings by Thursday, April 29.
Writing Assignments (W1 – W6)
You will complete a number of smaller writing assignments throughout the semester
in order to give you practice and prepare you for writing the two longer papers.
They should be typed in 12 pt. Times New Roman font, double-spaced, with 1”
margins on all sides and with page numbers. You do not need to consult critical
literature on the author or the text, but should instead engage yourself more
closely with the text, or an aspect of it, and formulate your thoughts about
it in a cohesive fashion. For the longer papers we will use a peer review process
to help you improve your writing. During the peer review, give constructive
feedback to your fellow students. We will work with Edward A. Shannon’s
book to support your writing about literature. Assignments are due at the beginning
of the class period. Email submissions and late submissions will only be accepted
with my permission.
Papers
The first paper will be 2 1/2 - 3 1/2 pages, the second 4-5 pages. As for the
shorter writing assignments, the format will be 1” margins on all sides,
12 pt. Times New Roman font, double-spaced, with page numbers. I am most interested
in your own original ideas, not someone else’s, nor in a paraphrase of
my comments from class, our class-discussions, or the readings themselves. Pay
attention to good organization and logical transitions between paragraphs. Base
your arguments on close readings; give concrete examples (quotes) from the texts
to support your arguments; and avoid vague impressions and over-generalization.
Do not use excessively long quotations to fill up the pages, unless you are
doing a close analysis of a passage and absolutely need all of the long quote.
When referring to the Norton Anthology, simply follow the following format (Flaubert,
Madame Bovary, p. 928; for poems: Blake, “The Lamb,” p. 543). If
you use ideas or quotes from critical literature (books, articles, internet,
etc.), you need to document your sources and give proper credit to someone else’s
ideas (whether you quote directly or rephrase their ideas)—otherwise you
violate academic honesty and commit plagiarism (see below for policy). Do not
make someone else’s ideas the major focus of your paper. For the format
of footnotes and bibliography, if you have them, refer to the MLA Style Manual
(available in bookstore or library). Paper topics will be given out later in
the semester. Edward A. Shannon’s book addresses many issues about the
process as well as the mechanics of writing a high quality paper for a university
literature course; refer to it often! Papers are due at the beginning of the
class period. Email submissions and late submissions will only be accepted with
my permission.
Help with your writing assignments and papers is available at Writing and Speaking Tutorial Services, check out their website at: http://www.ncsu.edu/tutorial_center/writespeak/index.htm
Exams
The focus of the exams is somewhat different from that of the writing assignments,
but both support each other. What I’m looking for in the exams is concrete,
exact, and well-presented knowledge. Both exams will consist of:
Identifications of characters: identify the author, work, and original
language; explain the character’s function in the text.
Identifications of passages: identify the author, work, and original
language; briefly discuss the relevance of the passage for the work in question.
Brief explanations of literary terms, of periods, etc., with examples
from the literary texts.
Mini-Essay on a larger topic, e.g. comparing how a certain topic is
treated in several of the texts we read.
The best way to prepare for these exams is regular preparation, active participation
in group and whole class discussions, effective (extensive!) note-taking, and
completing the writing assignments. The exams will be based on what has been
covered in class; an expectation sheet for each exam will be made available
to guide your preparation.
Make-up exams will only be given with prior permission or excused absences (for
a definition of an excused absence, see the web site listed in the next section).
Grading scale for exams and assignments (in %)
| 100 – 97 A + | 89 – 87 B + | 79 – 77 C + | 69 – 67 D + | |
| 96 – 93 A | 86 – 83 B | 76 – 73 C | 66 – 63 D | |
| 92 – 90 A - | 82 – 80 B - | 72 – 70 C - | 62 – 60 D - | less than 60 F |
Class Attendance Policy
Regular attendance is a university requirement. For every unexcused absence
in excess of 2 (two) classes, your semester grade could be reduced by 1%. If
you miss more than 10 minutes of a class period (unless pre-approved by me),
it will count as an absence, but I encourage you to still attend the class so
as not to miss the material. If you accumulate more than 8 unexcused absences
your semester grade will be an F. If you have to miss a class, please inform
me about it beforehand or as soon as possible after the absence. You will still
be expected to be prepared for the next class; contact a class mate for information
on the missed material and any assignments or changes in the schedule. For information
about what qualifies as an excused absence, please consult: http://www.ncsu.edu/provost/academic_regulations/attend/reg.htm
Students with Disabilities
Reasonable accommodations will be made for students with verifiable disabilities.
You need to register with Disability Services for Students at 1900 Student Health
Center, Campus Box 7509, 515-7653. For more information consult http://www.ncsu.edu/provost/offices/affirm_action/dss/.
Academic Integrity Policy
Human interaction and effective communication function on the basis of trust.
An atmosphere of trust, honesty and respect for each other fosters educational
progress and success. Please do not give me any reason to be suspicious of your
honesty. You are to do your own work on all class assigments, papers, and exams,
unless it is a designated pair or group assigment. For papers that also means
not incorporating others’ ideas and selling them as your own—this
is called plagiarism. Whether you take ideas (verbatim or just as an idea) from
books, the internet, or other sources does not matter; you need to acknowledge
their source if they are not your own. Let me warn you especially about the
temptations of the internet. You will find more details in Shannon, pp. 148-150.
Also, the NC State Library has a Plagiarism Tutorial at: http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/scc/tutorial/plagiarism/index.html
Please ask me about anything that remains unclear. Violations of academic integrity
(plagiarism, cheating, etc.) will be prosecuted according to NC State’s
policy on academic integrity, posted at: http://www.ncsu.edu/policies/student_services/student_discipline/POL11.35.1.php
Semester Schedule
Page numbers refer to the Norton Anthology (unless specified as page numbers
in Shannon’s book). For each class, read and prepare the reading selection
for that day: underline, annotate, take notes. If there is a speaking assignment,
print it and bring it to class from that day on until we have finished discussing
it. Familiarizing yourself with the speaking assignment before you read the
selection will help structure your reading and focus your attention on important
issues. We will follow this schedule but it will be flexible: if we need more
time on a certain text, we may spend more time, and will then shorten or cut
something else, as necessary.
For the WebCT Postings: oc = original contribution; r = response.
| Class and Date | Reading Selection for Class Discussion; Speaking Assignment for Group Work | Writing Assignment due | WebCT Posting due |
| Literature / Translation / Interpretation | |||
| 1 - Tue, 13 January | Introduction to the Course; Chronology of Western Literature; start Calvino, “Serpents and Skulls”; S1: Group Work on Calvino | ||
| The Enlightenment | |||
| 2 - Th, 15 January | finish Calvino; Introduction, 1-7; Voltaire, Candide, 316-337 |
|
|
| 3 - Tue, 20 January | Snow and Ice in Raleigh |
|
|
| 4 - Th, 22 January | Voltaire, Candide, 337-379; Shannon chapter 1; S2: Group Work on Voltaire |
W1: Essay on Calvino | oc Introductions, oc Calvino, oc Voltaire |
| 5 - Tue, 27 January | S2: Group Work on Voltaire | r Introductions, r Calvino, oc Rousseau | |
| Romanticism | |||
| 6 - Th, 29 January | Introduction, 417-426; Rousseau, Confessions, 427-437, Shannon chapter 2 | W2: Notes on “Night” | r Voltaire |
| 7 - Tue, 3 February | S3: Group Work on Rousseau; Intro to Goethe | r Rousseau, oc Goethe | |
| 8 - Th, 5 February | Goethe, Faust, 438-480 | W3: Goethe Outline | |
| 9 - Tue, 10 February | Goethe, Faust, 480-540, Shannon chapter 3; S4: Group Work on Goethe | ||
| 10 - Th, 12 February | Blake, 540-549; Shannon chapter 4; S5: Group Work on Blake | r Goethe, oc Blake | |
| 11 - Tue, 17 February | Heine, 619-620 | oc Heine | |
| Realism | |||
| 12 - Th, 19 February | Introduction, 835-840, 845; Flaubert, Madame Bovary, 846-890 | W4: Paper 1 Outline | r Blake |
| 13 - Tue, 24 February | Flaubert, Bovary, 891-1063, S6: Group Work on Flaubert | r Heine | |
| 14 - Th, 26 February | Flaubert, Bovary, final discussion; Shannon chapter 5, pp. 100 – 132 | oc Flaubert | |
| 15 - Tue, 2 March | Peer Review of Draft of First Paper: bring 3 copies of W5: Paper 1 Draft | W5: Paper 1 Draft | |
| 16 - Th, 4 March | Midterm on Material from first half of semester | r Flaubert | |
| Tue and Th, 9 and 11 March | Spring Break | ||
| The New Poetry | |||
| 17 - Tue, 16 March | Introduction, 840-844; Rilke, 1564-1570, Shannon chapter 5, pp. 132 – 163 | ||
| Modernism | |||
| 18 - Th, 18 March | Rilke, cont.; Introduction, 1337-1348; Mann, Death in Venice, 1510-1540; S7: Group Work on Mann | oc Rilke | |
| 19 - Tue, 23 March | Mann, Death in Venice, 1540-1564 | ||
| 20 - Th, 25 March | Mann, Death in Venice, final discussion | Paper 1 Final Version | r Rilke, oc Mann |
| 21 - Tue, 30 March | Woolf, A Room of One’s Own, 1615-1638 | oc Woolf | |
| 22 - Th, 1 April | Woolf, A Room of One’s Own, final discussion | r Mann | |
| 23 - Tue, 6 April | Kafka, The Metamorphosis, 1638-1661; S8: Group Work on Kafka | r Woolf | |
| Th, 8 April | Easter Break | ||
| 24 - Tue, 13 April | Kafka, The Metamorphosis, 1661-1672 | oc Kafka | |
| 25 - Th, 15 April | Peer Review of Draft of Second Paper: bring 3 copies of W6: Paper 2 Draft | W6: Paper 2 Draft | |
| 26 - Tue, 20 April | Brecht, The Good Woman of Setzuan, 1799-1836 | r Kafka | |
| 27 - Th, 22 April | Brecht, The Good Woman of Setzuan, 1836-1858 | oc Brecht | |
| 28 - Tue, 27 April | Brecht, final discussion | ||
| 29 - Th, 29 April | Conclusion and Review | Paper 2 Final Version | r Brecht |
| 30 - Tue, 4 May | 8 - 11:00 a.m. Final Exam on material from second half of semester (after Spring Break) | ||
Lecture Outlines (I suggest printing and bringing to class for note-taking)
Speaking Assignments (please print and bring to class)
Writing Assignments (I suggest printing them for yourself)