Conservation genetics
I. Major Issues
•Inbreeding depression
•Loss of genetic diversity
•Fragmentation of populations and loss of gene flow
•Genetic issues with captivity and reintroduction
•Resolving taxonomic uncertainties
•Understanding species biology
II. Management uses
•Minimizing inbreeding and loss of genetic diversity
•Resolving population structure
•Understanding species biology
•Choosing the best populations for reintroduction
•Resolving taxonomic uncertainties
•Defining management units w/in species
•Detecting hybridization
•Non-intrusive sampling
•Wildlife forensics
•Breeding captive species
1. Ne is a key parameter - usually less than census size in most populations
estimated from demographic data
also from genetic data (short, long term)
Size of an idealized population that would lose genetic diversity (or become inbred) at the same rate as the actual population
2. What factors influence estimates of Ne?
•Unequal proportions of females and males
•Sex ratios distorted by mating system
•Stochastic variation in small populations
•Anthropogenic effects
•Ne
= 4Nef
x Nem/ Nef +Nem
•Deviations
from 1:1 lead
to reduction in Ne
2. Molecular marker: defined segments of DNA in genome
Can be protein coding and non-coding à selectively neutral
Measuring genetic diversity: polymorphism
Chromosomal/immunological (1900s): first techniques, karyotyping, DNA-DNA hybridization as measure of genetic similarity
Proteins (1960s): enzyme (allozyme) electrophoresis
distinguish alternate allelic forms by changes in mobility
Organellar - Mitochondrial DNA
Advantages:
•High rates of mutation in animals
•Universal primers available
•No recombination
•Different regions evolve at
different rates
•Easy to amplify from non-invasive
samples
Organellar: Mitochondrial DNA
Disadvantages
•Only tells you about female
evolution
•Is only a single locus
•Nuclear translocated copies (Numts)
•Variable types of selection
•Heteroplasmy: more than
one sequence
What Are Microsatellites?
•Genetic markers based on variation of unique DNA sequences
•1-6 nucleotide core element tandemly repeated, e.g.
atatatatatatatatatat
= (at)10
•Allele size based on repeat number of core elements
Primer Design
Observed heterozygosity Ho
(using allele frequencies)
Provides a null model to identify whether evolutionary processes are occurring
Basic Assumptions of HWE: random mating, no migration, infinitely large population size & no migration
Can calculate expected heterozygosity for two alleles with frequencies p and q à HWE equation
p2 + 2pq + q2 = 1
p2 = frequency of allele A
2pq = frequency of heterozygote Aa
q2 = frequency of allele a
Estimating allele frequencies at a locus
Studies of gene flow integral to species biology
•Meta-population structure
•Estimators of population
•differentiation
•Indirect estimates of gene flow
•Population sizes in each fragment
•Migration rates b/n fragments
•Dispersal capacity of individual
organisms (along ecological
gradients?)
IV. Wright’s F statistics based on average and observed heterozygosity:
Hi = average observed heterozygosity across subpopulations
Hs = average expected heterozygosity across subpopulations
Ht= expected heterozygosity of the total population
FIS= (Hs – Hi)/ Hs à measures the degree of inbreeding (homozygosity excess) of individuals within their subpopulation
FIT = (Ht – Hi)/ Ht à measures the overall level of inbreeding of an individual relative to the total population (not commonly used)
FST = (Ht – Hs)/ Ht àthe “fixation index”, measures the degree of inbreeding of subpopulations relative to the total population, is a common estimator of subpopulation differentiation (i.e. population structure
Wright’s F statistics based on average and observed heterozygosity:
FIS= measures the degree of inbreeding of individuals within their subpopulation
ranges from 0 (no inbreeding) to 1 (full inbreeding)
FST = measures the degree of inbreeding of subpopulations relative to the total population
Ranges from 0 (no population structure) to 1 (fully separate populations)
Values > 0.2 are considered to reflect strong structuring
III. Genetic distance: genetic
relatedness based on the number
of allelic substitutions per locus
Character-based approach:
Conservation units identified based on presence/absence of nucleotide substitutions
Tree-based approach:
Conservation units identified based on ‘reciprocal monophyly’
•Phascolarctus cinereus – diverse morphology – differentiated into 3 subspecies
IV. Other uses of genetic knowledge for
conservation
Captive breeding
•Maximize the number of founders
•Maximize no. of breeders/generation
•Stimulate growth to carrying capacity
•Maximize Ne/N ratios
•Selection of individuals for
reintroduction
Cloning of endangered animal species
Species biology and natural history
•Relatedness and social behavior
•Paternity and reproductive success
•Predator-prey relationships
•Local population dynamics
Identifying hybridization
•Occurs at several levels (species, subspecies and populations)
•Produces offspring of mixed ancestry
•May be morphologically/ genetically intermediate
•Extensive hybridization; progeny not distinguishable from parental types
•“Genetic swamping” of rare/threatened species
•Outbreeding depression