| Research
Interests |
Influence
of resistance gene deployment and pathogen mating type on the population
biology and race structure of Phytophthora nicotianae
C.A. Gallup, Department of Plant Pathology, NC State University, Raleigh,
NC.
Introduction
Phytophthora nicotianae, the causal agent of black shank
of tobacco, occurs in most regions where tobacco is grown. The most
effective control strategy for this disease is the utilization of
single-gene (complete) and multigene (partial) resistance. Single-gene
resistance, conferred by the Phl and Php genes, provides complete
resistance to race 0 of P. nicotianae, but places high
selection pressure on the pathogen for the development of race 1of
the pathogen (Johnson 2002). Pathogen races are differentiated based
on the response on a set of host differentials that includes varieties
with the two single genes, Php and Phl. Race 0 overcomes neither
gene, race 1 overcomes both, and race 3 overcomes only the Phl gene
(Apple 1967, Litton 1966). Since the widespread deployment of the
Php gene in flue-cured tobacco, incidence of race 1 has increased
dramatically, becoming the dominant race in many flue-cured regions
of North Carolina. The Phl gene is incorporated primarily in burley
tobacco, and its deployment also resulted in the occurrence of race
1 (Litton 1966). Multigene resistance, referred to as Florida 301
(Fla 301) resistance, confers levels of partial resistance from
low to high (Jones 1995). Since Fla 301 resistance is regulated
by multiple genes, it should not select for a pathogenic race. Nevertheless,
in a field microplot study and a greenhouse inoculation trial, a
new race, race 3, was recovered from treatments planted only with
varieties with partial resistance and infested with race 0. In recent
black shank surveys and in a state-wide survey conducted in 2006,
we identified the new race in multiple counties throughout the state.
Phytophthora nicotianae is heterothallic, requiring two
mating types, A1 and A2, for the production of sexual spores (oospores).
Results from our state-wide survey indicated the potential for sexual
recombination to occur in fields since both mating types were present
in some locations. It is generally assumed that oospores do not
contribute to the epidemiology of the disease. However, the high
levels of variability observed in tobacco populations of P.
nicotianae indicate this might be occurring (unpublished data).
Diversity also can arise from asexual variability. We collected
100 single zoospore isolates from several race 3 isolates and screened
them for race. High levels of phenotypic diversity were identified
within a single asexual generation, suggesting that the pathogen’s
genome is exceedingly plastic, and asexual variability may be a
significant contributor to population diversity. Higher levels of
diversity may lead to more rapid race shifts in the presence of
single-gene resistance conferred by the Phl or Php genes.
Even though
previous studies of world P. nicotianae populations
revealed little diversity (Colas 1998, Förster 1990, Liou
2002, Oudemans 1991), more recent investigations that utilized
RAPD and AFLP analysis revealed significant levels of diversity
within tobacco field populations (Zhang 2003, Sullivan and Shew
unpublished). In 2003, Zhang et al estimated moderate levels
of genotypic diversity in China, ranging from 0.24 to 0.34 within
seven field populations to 0.36 among all populations based on
RAPD analysis. In our lab, Melinda Sullivan identified a very
high level of variability within a single field. She examined
AFLP profiles of 175 P. nicotianae
isolates collected over multiple years from a single field in Duplin
county and found 106 unique AFLP profiles, some of which occurred
repeatedly only on specific cultivars (unpublished data).
Objectives
Our goal in this project is to conduct a comprehensive examination
of the population biology of the pathogen, focusing on sexual and
asexual recombination as contributors to pathogen variability. Specifically,
we plan to determine how pathogen biology and resistance management
strategies affect race development by:
1) Tracking race development when pathogen populations are exposed
to different types of resistance and rotation schemes
2) Examining pathogen diversity generated by asexual and possibly
sexual recombination
3) Comparing race development and pathogen diversity between plots
with and without the potential for sexual recombination
Experimental
Approach
To address these objectives, microplots were planted with partial
resistance and/or single-gene resistance.
Microplots were infested with race 0 isolates that were either
the A1 or A2 mating type, or both. After each season, isolates
will be collected from the soil of each plot and screened for race
and mating type. In 2005, after just one season, race 3 was recovered
from 13 out of 15 treatments, regardless of whether one or both
mating types were present or the type of resistance that was deployed.
No race 1 was identified.
At the end of the third season, selected isolates will undergo
AFLP analysis to determine diversity within each treatment.
Significance
Characterizing the level of genetic variability arising from asexual
and sexual recombination will help elucidate how variability
influences the development of pathogen races and how human
activities drive pathogen evolution. This information can
be used by breeders and pathologists interested in the development
and deployment of different types of resistance genes and
their short and long term viability for disease management.
References
1) Apple, J.L. 1967. Occurrence of race 1 of Phytophthora parasitica
var. nicotianae in
North Carolina and its implications
in breeding for disease resistance. Tobacco
Science 11: 79-83.
2) V. Colas, I. Lacourt, P. Ricci, F. Vanlerberghe-Masutti, P. Venard,
A. Poupet, and F.
Panabiéres. 1998. Diversity
of virulence in Phytophthora parasitica on tobacco, as
reflected by nuclear RFLPs.
Phytopathology 88 (3): 205-212.
3) H. Förster, P. Oudemans, and M.D. Coffey. 1990. Mitochondrial
and nuclear DNA
diversity within six species
of Phytophthora. Experimental mycology 14: 18-31.
4) Johnson, E.S., M.F. Wolff, E.A. Wernsman, W.R. Atchley, and H.D.
Shew. 2002.
Origin of the black shank resistance
gene, Ph, in tobacco cultivar Coker 371-gold.
Plant Disease 86: 1080-1084.
5) Jones, K.J. and H.D. Shew. 1995. Early season root production
and zoospore infection
of cultivars of flue-cured
tobacco that differ in level of partial resistance to
Phytophthora parasitica
var. nicotianae. Plant and Soil 172: 55-61.
6) R.F. Liou, J.T. Lee, H.C. Lee, and P.J. Ann. 2002. Analysis of
Phytophthora parasitica
by retrotransposon-derived
DNA fingerprinting. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica
43: 21-29.
7) Litton, C.C., G.W. Stokes, and J.H. Smiley. 1966. Occurrence
of race 1 of
Phytophthora parasitica
var. nicotianae. Tobacco Science 10: 73-74.
8) P. Oudemans and M.D. Coffey. 1991. A revised systematics of twelve
papillate
Phytophthora species based
on isozyme analysis. Mycological research 95: 1025-
1046.
9) X.G. Zhang, W.X. Sun, L. Guo, J.F. Yu, and C.J. Chang. 2003.
Genetic and pathogenic
variation among tobacco black
shank strains of Phytophthora parasitica var.
nicotianae from
the main tobacco growing in China. Journal of Phytopathology 151:
259-266.
|