John Dennis, remarks on the Pindaric Ode in Preface to the Court
of Death (1695)
.. it will not be amiss to
show what the Ode and its Character is in general, what Pindar and his manner was in particular, and how far it may be
convenient to imitate him in our Age and Climate.
…the Ode ought to have
as much boldness, elevation and majesty, as Epic Poetry itself; but then it is
certain that it ought to have more vehemence, more transport, more enthusiasm.
The reason is evident, For the Design of the Ode (I mean upon great occasions)
is, like that of Heroic Poetry, to move the Reader, and cause in him
admiration. Now by Heroic Poetry,
the Readers mind is exalted gradually, with a more sedate and composed Majesty;
but the Ode, by reason of its shortness of its compass, is obliged to fly into
transport at first, and to make use immediately of all its fury, and its most violent efforts, or else it would want time to work
its effect.
[on
the traits of Pindar]
…here are some great
qualities conspicuous in Pindar . . .
his vehemence, his impetuousness, and the magnificent sounds of his numbers;
and here is another thing which is the result of the rest, and that is
something dreadful, something which terribly shakes us, at the very same time
it transports us. There remains some other things which all the World has observed
in Pindar, and that is, his affected
digressions, his perpetual rambles, and his sudden and unexpected returns.
… as
we ought not to imitate Pindar in the
boldness of some of his figures, so neither in the wildness of his frequent
digressions; as Mr. Cowley has imitated him. For the English Reader, generally
speaking, not having half the degree of Fire which the Grecians had, nor
Spirits so strangely volatile, cannot immediately Sympathize
with an Author in his sudden and impetuous starts from his subject; nor discern
in a moment the almost imperceptible connexion
between the Digression and the principle matter
…the Ode ought to be by
its character, strong, and warm, and grave, and great, and exalted. (in Hooker ed.,
pp. I.43-4).