Mary Creech Gulledge

Dr. J. Morillo

English 579

September 19, 2008

 

 

Will the Real Fool Please Stand Up?

Dorimant as the Fool in George Etherege’s The Man of Mode 

 

 

In George Etherege’s Restoration comedy, The Man of Mode, the obvious fool of the play is Sir Fopling Flutter, an annoying man who is ridiculed for his shallow and ostentatious efforts to impress the English nobility with the latest French manners and trends.  Dorimant, on the other hand, is the noble, irresistible rake who, despite his callous treatment of women, is well-regarded by his peers.  In Act V, however, Dorimant’s own shallow concerns for appearance and reputation show him to be as much a fool as Sir Fopling.   The powerful and clever dialogue between Dorimant and Mrs. Loveit, a result of Dorimant’s need to confront Loveit for her public affection towards Sir Fopling, magnifies Dorimant’s fragile ego; it makes him appear more foolish, more unattractive in his disdain for women, and more unlikely to be a believable candidate for marriage—especially to the beautiful and intelligent Harriet, the woman he loves.

 Such exposed foolishness in this charming and enviable ladies’ man, complicates the plot, and more than suggests that Sir Fopling is the Epilogue’s “nauseous harlequin in farce,” while Dorimant, who is more human and less a caricature, is the real “substantial ass.”   Dorimant’s disregard for the feelings of women, however, does little to arouse disdain; after all, this kind of ass-like behavior is expected from such a man in such a comedy.  His foolishness, then, emerges only when he moves from behaving as the Restoration comedy’s stereotypical rake to a man with a disturbing, exaggerated fear that his reputation has been blemished.  In his exchange with Mrs. Loveit in Act V, Dorimant’s very human fear takes full possession of his ego, and causes him to behave so irrationally that, could he but only understand, he would see that his behavior is far more humiliating to his character than any damage Loveit has done him.  His bizarre behavior, coupled with Mrs. Loveit’s verbal response to such behavior, makes clear Etherege’s underlying message that those who are well-liked and successful are no more immune to being seen as desperate and clueless than anyone else.   There is no comfort, says Etherege, in thinking that people like Sir Fopling are the only fools.  Presenting Dorimant as his proof, Etherege refuses to let the soothing, conventional comic resolutions at the end of his play distract his audience from the Epilogue’s final social commentary that Sir Fopling “represents ye all.”  

If Dorimant, then, comes to be, in the course of the play, Etherege’s less obvious, but more substantial fool, Dorimant’s inability to refrain from going too far with his unreasonable and foolish behavior is, ironically, foreshadowed in Harriet’s response to his first profession of love for her.  She says, “When your love’s grown strong enough to make you bear being laughed at, I’ll give you leave to trouble me with it.  Till when, pray forbear, sir” (IV. i.186-88). Unfortunately for Harriet, Dorimant’s unyielding demands of Loveit, in Act V’s first scene, demonstrate that even under the best of circumstances, his ego cannot withstand ridicule.  Though he has experienced the love and adoration of many women at once and has just recently found a greater joy in loving and being loved by Harriet, his joy, surprisingly, does not weaken his intent to seek revenge against Loveit for showing favor to Sir Fopling.  At the very moment he rushes to Mrs. Loveit’s lodgings with a crazed insistence that she rectify the wrong she has done him, his easy confidence that he is revered by the ladies and admired by the men begins to unravel.  The more he converses with Mrs. Loveit, the more he reveals, bit by bit, that his forceful and unruly ego controls him, even when his heart has tasted the possibilities of true love.  Etherege is speaking of Dorimant, as much as Fopling, when he says in the Prologue, “But tickled once with praise, by her good will/The wanton fool would never more lie still”  (9-10). 

Mrs. Loveit, surprised that Dorimant has come to her lodgings after he has blatantly rejected her, asks what she has done to enrage him.   Dorimant, who is indifferent to the pain he has caused her, tells her that she has done “a thing that puts you below my scorn and makes my anger as ridiculous as you have made my love” (V.i.196-197).  When she readily admits that she did walk with Sir Fopling, Dorimant’s response is unstable; he sounds out of control and ridiculous in his seriousness about the matter: “You did, madam, and you talked and laughed aloud—Ha, ha, ha,--Oh, that laugh, that laugh becomes the confidence of a woman of quality” (V.i.199-201).  His irrationality becomes even more obvious as it accelerates alongside Loveit’s efforts to placate him with careful logic.  His voice is surely raised when he says to her, “…I shall daily be reminded of it.  ‘Twill be a commonplace for all the Town to laugh at me.”  Then, after her even reply, ‘Twill be believed a jealous sprite. Come, forget it,” he is not pacified in the least and is more determined than ever not to forget it ( ).  Unable to accept even the slightest chance that he might be laughed at, he cannot see, in his paranoid state, that Mrs. Loveit’s attentions to Fopling are much too insignificant to make someone of his position a target of ridicule.    

 A prey to his ego, he says, “Let me consult my reputation; you are too careless of it.  You shall meet Sir Fopling in the Mall again tonight  (V.i.2  -247).  Mrs. Loveit, however, cannot be intimidated into meeting Sir Fopling for the sole purpose of snubbing him.  For the first time since she has loved Dorimant, she stands her ground and will not agree to make herself look foolish for the sake of restoring his reputation.  Particularly because she still has feelings for Dorimant, Loveit’s strong and clever words of resistance to his narcissistic request show her awakened good sense and, in contrast, make Dorimant’s pleas look increasingly absurd. She says, “Public satisfaction for the wrong I have done you?  This is some new device to make me more ridiculous!” (V.i.253-55).

 Dorimant looks even more pathetic when he continues to say, “You will be persuaded,” “Are you so obstinate?” and “You will not satisfy my love,” and Mrs. Loveit’s firm and final reply, “I would die to satisfy [your love]…, but I will not, to save you from a thousand racks, do a shameless thing to please your vanity,” forces Dorimant to leave with his insatiable ego unsatisfied (V.i.263-65).  Clearly, Dorimant’s erratic behavior shows that he is not strong enough to bear being laughed at, and that he cares just as much about appearances as Sir Fopling Flutter.   Having played the fool, Dorimant’s demand that Loveit go to unreasonable lengths to repair his status, and thus free him from possible ridicule, is as much reason to diminish his plausibility as a potential husband as is his constant philandering and lack of concern for the feelings of his mistresses. 

Similarly in Act V, Dorimant and Loveit’s lively dialogue about the characteristics of the “senseless mimic” and “noisy fools” serves to promulgate Dorimant’s inappropriate behavior towards women and liken his behavior to the ridiculous folk he detests.  He and Loveit speak hastily back and forth:  each time she gives a reason to value the fool, she discredits Dorimant’s bad treatment of her;  each time Dorimant responds with reasons why the fool is insufferable, he, unknowingly, describes himself.   Surely Etherege is having great fun with a man like Dorimant who is twice the fool in this witty exchange.

First of all, Loveit devalues Dorimant’s shallow admiration of women when she defends the company of doting fools, “You’ll despise ‘em as the dull effects of ignorance and / vanity, yet I care not if I mention some.  First, they / really admire us, while you at best but flatter us well” (V.i.120-122).  Dorimant’s immediate response, “Take heed, fools can dissemble, too—,” not only says the obvious, that blatant fawns can hide the truth as much as anyone, but it is a perfect reiteration of Dorimant’s own role as a foolish master of frequent, shallow declarations of love. 

 In their next give and take, when Loveit says about fools, “…there is no fear they should deceive us…They are ever offering us their service and always waiting on our will,” she is letting Dorimant know that he never was unselfish enough to wait on her will, even when he was making love to her  (V.i.124-127). Dorimant’s immediate retort is, again, a perfect echo of Dorimant’s own ego-driven behavior.

He says of the fool’s willingness to serve women, “You owe that to their excessive idleness. They know not how to entertain themselves at home, and find so little welcome abroad, they are fain to fly to you / who countenance ‘em as a refuge against the / solitude they would be otherwise condemned to” (V.ii. 128-132). Thinking he is merely criticizing a Fopling-type fool who must always have company, Dorimant is simultaneously disclosing his own shaky ego that cannot bear being alone.  As his history with many lovers attests, Dorimant must always find an adoring woman to be with him.  He must either be in the company of a woman he cares for, like Belinda, and later Harriet, or he must be in the company of a woman who still loves him—a large part, obviously, of why he must take issue with Mrs. Loveit regarding her interest in Sir Fopling.

 When Dorimant attempts to convince Loveit that fools “believe too well of / themselves and always better of you than you deserve,” and then chides her for mistaking the use of fools, that “they are designed for properties and not for friends,” his words are particularly laden with double meaning (V.ii.144;160-161). In these instances, Dorimant is describing his own egocentric character and unfeeling treatment of women even more accurately than he is describing  behavior exhibited by Sir Fopling or any other fool in the play.  Not only is Dorimant the most obvious character who thinks too much of himself, and most often believes his detestable treatment of women is still better than they deserve, he is also no friend to women, and can actually be seen as an egotistical piece of property that the women in his life can rent.  However, when a woman he is with can no longer pay his required price of beauty, charm, wit, sexual availability, and non-interference in his affairs, he moves on to a new, more interesting woman who can “pay” him more.  As a desirable piece of property, which serves as an interesting twist of identity for the usual patriarchal prototype of the time, he can remain detached and, likewise, demand that the accountability from any woman always be on his terms. 

Though the clever Harriet may have possibly won his heart more than any other, Dorimant’s self-centered attitudes and behaviors—as particularly revealed through his dialogue scene with Mrs. Loveit, do not leave much room for hope that he will be transformed into a man wise enough and rational enough to enjoy the structure of marriage.  When Dorimant adamantly declares that he is ready to make Harriet his wife, the audience must hope beyond reason that Harriet can continue to meet Dorimant’s property rental requirements.  Alas, Dorimant’s words and actions during his last visit to Mrs. Loveit’s home offer more probability than not that Dorimant, the fool, will never be a fool for love.  Dorimant might have grown to be more self-reflective had he taken Sir Fopling’s advice in Act IV to hang a mirror in his lodging.  Fopling says, “A room is the dullest thing without one” (IV.ii.88-89).  If Dorimant had carefully looked at himself and seen his foolishness reflected, he might have become a more reformed rake and a more believable husband-to-be.  Then, Sir Fopling, though not especially substantial,  would have been the greater ass, hands down. 

 

 

Etherege, George.  The Man of Mode. The Broadview Anthology of Restoration

            and Early Eighteenth-Century Drama.  Ed. Douglas Canfield.  Ontario,

            Canada: Broadview Press Ltd, 2002.  526-588